Showing posts with label ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ford. Show all posts

Monday, February 8, 2010

Ford Making Fix to 2010 Mustang Shelby GT500 Tire Information


DEARBORN, Michigan — Ford is making a fix to 243 of its 2010 Mustang Shelby GT500 cars because the rear tire size information was incorrectly marked on the label.

The recall affects 2010 Shelby GT500s built between October 28 and December 3, 2009. Ford will deal with the problem by sending owners the correct tire label, as well as instructions on how to attach it, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said on its Web site. The safety campaign is slated to start on or around February 8. In the meantime, owners can contact Ford at (866) 436-7332 or NHTSA at (888) 327-4236
read more...

Ford: Braking Glitch in 2010 Fusion and Milan Hybrids Will Be Remedied


DEARBORN, Michigan — Ford said Thursday it will update the software of the regenerative braking system on some 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid and Mercury Milan Hybrids that are already in customers' hands. Ford's action comes on the heels of a similar issue with the 2010 Toyota Prius that is expected to prompt a recall.

"We have received reports that some drivers have experienced a different brake feel when the hybrid's unique regenerative brakes switch to conventional hydraulic braking," said Ford in a statement regarding the two hybrid vehicles. "While the vehicles maintain full braking capability, customers may initially perceive the condition as loss of brakes....More
read more...

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Ford halts Transit van production in China over pedal


Following the government mandated sales freeze and subsequent production halt in the U.S. by Toyota for eight of its popular models, Ford has announced that it shares a common supplier for the diesel Transit Classic commercial van in China. Ford announced that it has not received a single report of unintended acceleration, but it will suspend Chinese production of the model until the pedal can be reviewed.....More
read more...

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Ford owes $23 Billion to The Banks Sales Down 16%

Everyone applauded Ford for not taking any Government loans.....

Well it's because months before the calapse they mortgaged the entire company for $23Billion dollars.

Now Ford has 3 Times the Debt of GM/Chrysler, no wage concessions from the UAW and Sales down 15.9% from last year. (it's worst year in 40 Years)

They are pinning there hopes on the New Focus and Festiva. Which are not bad, but they are a Focus and Festiva, you've already done that.

The Fusion, Taurus, Escape, lack emotion in design and already appear dated.

The Mustang is still a favorite and makes a nice rent-a-car.

Even the Ford flagship F150 is dated and weak compared to the GM Sierra and Dodge Ram trucks.

Well at least they have the Ford Transit.....Joke
read more...

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Ford F150 Uses Tires Made In China-Tire tariff jolts Ford supplier


Tire tariff jolts Ford supplier

Korean firm with factories in China weighs options to keep outfitting F-series trucks
Bryce G. Hoffman / The Detroit News

Few things scream "American" louder than Ford Motor Co.'s F-series pickup, but some models of the best-selling vehicle in the United States sport tires made in China.

And that means Chinese tire makers are not the only ones scrambling in the wake of President Barack Obama's new tariffs.

Hankook Tire supplies the base tires for the Ford F-150. It is not a Chinese company, but a Korean manufacturer with factories in China.

That still means that tires produced at those facilities, including those for the F-150, will be subject to the 35 percent tariff that goes into effect on Sept 26....More
read more...

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Big 3 sales fade as 'clunkers' wraps up

Low inventories cited in sinking U.S. share of incentive program

David Shepardson / Detroit News Washington Bureau

Washington -- The Detroit Three automakers' share of "cash for clunkers" sales fell sharply, compared to foreign nameplates, in the final week of the $3 billion incentive program.

General Motors Co., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler Group LLC sold 38.6 percent, or about 266,000 of the nearly 700,000 clunker replacements. That's far below their combined 45.3 percent share of 2009 auto sales.

The U.S.-based companies said they were hampered by a comparative shortage of small, fuel-efficient vehicles that buyers were seeking and that the Asian automakers provided....Freep--More
read more...

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Ford, Chrysler low on small cars


Chrysler Group LLC and Ford Motor Co. are running low on their hottest-selling models under the cash for clunkers program, even as President Barack Obama signed authorization Friday of an additional $2 billion to extend the program.

Some Chrysler dealers are out of the Dodge Caliber, Dodge Avenger, Jeep Compass and Jeep Patriot.


“We sold out a week ago,” said Steve Demers, general manager of Cueter Chrysler Jeep Dodge in Ypsilanti. “While I am happy that the additional money was approved, I, along with others, will not be able to take advantage of the demand.”


Chrysler’s Belvidere, Ill., assembly plant, which makes the Caliber, Compass and Patriot, is trying to catch up.


“It may take some dealers a couple of weeks to get more small cars,” Chrysler spokeswoman Kathy Graham said.


Ford’s stock of the Focus and Escape, its two hottest-selling clunker replacements, is low, according to WardsAuto.com, which tracks inventory.


The lack of popular Fords and Chryslers could drive buyers to foreign-brand cars that are selling well under the program. Even with more money available, the popular program is expected to end this month....More
read more...

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

GM, Ford, Chrysler U.S. Sales Fell Less Than Estimates in May


June 2 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC posted U.S. May sales that fell less than analysts’ estimates as shoppers returned to showrooms, while Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. did worse than expected.

GM said today that U.S. deliveries tumbled 30 percent, and Chrysler dropped 47 percent. Ford, the only major U.S. automaker not in bankruptcy, had a 24 percent decline. Toyota’s sales plunged 41 percent, and Honda plummeted 42 percent. Nissan Motor Co. fared better than estimates, falling 33 percent.

The results showed the industry benefited from the biggest jump in six years in the Conference Board’s consumer sentiment index. May marked Chrysler’s first month of sales after its April 30 bankruptcy and the countdown to GM’s Chapter 11 filing yesterday.

“There’s no doubt; it’s progress,” said Gary Dilts, senior vice president of research firm J.D. Power & Associates in Troy, Michigan. “If you are going to see some uptick, you want to see it in May, June, July” when sales usually peak.

Analysts expected GM to be down 37 percent, based on a Bloomberg survey of 5 analysts, while Ford was projected to be off 29 percent and Chrysler off by 51 percent. Toyota’s decline was estimated to be 40 percent, based on 3 estimates, and Nissan and Honda were projected to decline 37 percent and 38 percent...more
read more...

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Auto Task Force Set to Back More Loans -- With Strings


The latest report on the Auto Task Force from the Wall Street Journal

By NEIL KING JR. and JOHN D. STOLL
President Barack Obama last month handed his auto-industry team a seemingly impossible task: to engineer the most complicated industrial restructuring ever attempted by the federal government, and to do it fast.

With almost no experience in the car business, the team's dozen core members have undergone a crash course in the myriad woes plaguing the U.S. auto industry. Within days, just over a month after setting to work, they'll begin announcing decisions.

Interviews with task-force members indicate that the administration doesn't want to let General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC slip into bankruptcy protection, a course advocated by some critics of the industry. Instead, the task force is expected to say that it sees viable futures for both GM and Chrysler, but only if there are sacrifices from their managements, unions and GM's bondholders. The team will also lay out a firm timeline for action.

The government is prepared to lend the companies more money. The two companies have requested $22 billion more -- including $9 billion for the second quarter. But the task force may not disburse new aid immediately, choosing instead to preserve that as leverage.

Hanging in the balance are the jobs of 140,000 GM and Chrysler employees, more than 10,000 dealerships across the country, and a large swath of the industrial base in the Midwest.

On Wednesday, the task force met with officials from Chrysler and Italy's Fiat SpA and indicated it is still interested in seeing the two companies form an alliance, as the companies have proposed, according to two people who attended the meeting.

It's clear the team is not yet ready to put forward a comprehensive fix. "It's a steep learning curve that they've been climbing, and there is still a lot to do," said Michigan Rep. Gary Peters, whose district in suburban Detroit houses hundreds of auto suppliers, a few days after meeting with the task force. "That's why I suspect they'll come out with some preliminary statements, and then get back to work."

In session after session in a warren of offices at the Treasury Department, the team has sat through tutorials on dealer financing, studied basic data and debated the future of U.S. car sales. They have spent days trying to understand the complexities of the hundreds of companies that supply the car companies with axles, seats and other parts......More
read more...

Monday, March 2, 2009

Chrysler News-Cerberus defends not pumping more funds into Chrysler

Stephen Feinberg-Founder of Cerberus Capital Management LLC


Private-equity fund responds to New York Times editorial

Chrissie Thompson
Automotive News
March 2, 2009 - 12:43 pm ET

Cerberus Capital Management LP wants more federal loans for Chrysler LLC in order to avoid "excessive risk-taking" that contributed to Wall Street's demise, Cerberus' COO said today in The New York Times.

Mark Neporent, COO of the private-equity fund that owns 80.1 percent of Chrysler, made the comments in a letter responding to a critical Times editorial last week.

The Times had said Chrysler's restructuring plan submitted Feb. 17 to the Treasury Department was "little more than an assurance that it has already cut costs and accomplished most of what it had to do." The newspaper questioned why Cerberus is not putting more money into Chrysler, as "private-equity funds like Cerberus are supposed to do."

Cerberus intends to protect its investors through rules that limit how much capital it can commit to an individual company, Neporent said in his letter.

"Why should these retirees, universities and charities, simply because they are represented by a private investment manager, be required to take additional risks or make additional investments, when GM or Ford shareholders are not?" he wrote.

Neporent said Cerberus had appointed a "world-class management team" that "has executed many of the hard operational fixes that other American car companies are only now addressing." He reiterated Cerberus' willingness to surrender its equity stake in Chrysler Automotive, convert debt to equity and put $2 billion in other Chrysler interests on a lower priority behind the government's loans.

The Times' editorial had called the 100,000-unit production cut Chrysler offered in its Treasury restructuring plan "paltry." The automaker would then have "capacity to make almost 1 million vehicles more than it will sell this year -- on the questionable assumption that demand, and its market share, will bounce back next year," the editorial said.

The Times suggested the government had good reasons to say no to Chrysler's request for $5 billion in federal loans in addition to the $4 billion it has already received.

"It seems the secretive private-equity fund is willing to gamble on Chrysler's survival with the taxpayer's dime, but not its own," the editorial said. "Saying no might even make Cerberus reconsider and put up some cash of its own."

Cerberus took control of Chrysler in August 2007, appointing former Home Depot CEO Bob Nardelli to the automaker's top position. Nardelli, who had a reputation as a tough cost-cutter, hired former Home Depot executive John Campi as purchasing chief. Campi has since resigned, but not before withholding bailout cash from now-liquidated Plastech Engineered Products Inc. and litigating with other suppliers.

Other changes have included the arrival of Toyota's Jim Press to run Chrysler's dealer and marketing operations and Nardelli's $1.5 billion overhaul of 400 fit-and-finish problems in Chrysler vehicles.
read more...

Sunday, February 15, 2009

GM and Chysler News:Union turns to Ford after GM and Chrysler talks stall



SOUTHFIELD, Michigan: Ford Motor became the focus of United Automobile Workers union negotiations over the weekend after talks with General Motors and Chrysler stalled.

The union objected to GM and Chrysler proposals to modify a retiree health care fund that Alan Reuther, a UAW lobbyist, said went beyond the requirements of the U.S. Treasury loans that the two automakers were relying on to survive. The U.S. government requires signed preliminary labor agreements by Tuesday, though it has not said what the consequences would be for missing the deadline.

Ford was continuing to talk with the union, said a company spokesman, Mark Truby, who declined to characterize the talks.

Harley Shaiken, a labor professor for the University of California at Berkeley, said, "What this reflects is that the UAW has a better relationship with Ford and feels that an agreement that suits both sides can be reached and can then be spread to the other automakers."

The terms of the Dec. 19 loan agreements from the U.S. Treasury require GM and Chrysler to persuade the UAW to accept half of scheduled payments into a union-run retiree health care fund next year in equity instead of cash. The automakers are also seeking to eliminate supplemental unemployment pay and to change plant work rules to trim labor expenses.

Ford had said it expected to receive whatever concessions the UAW granted GM and Chrysler, and Ron Gettelfinger, the union's president, said last month that Ford would likely get similar concessions.

The GM and Chrysler proposals on the Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association "contradict the explicit terms of the Treasury loan agreements, and would severely hurt retirees," Reuther said in an e-mail message. "These proposals are a non-starter as far as the UAW is concerned."

In GM's case, the union must sign off on a cash contribution of $10.2 billion to the fund instead of $20.4 billion, GM said last month. The UAW already agreed to accept reduced cash payments into the health care fund, which was established under the 2007 contract that let automakers pay new workers half as much as traditional union employees.

Gettelfinger said in 2007 that the union was confident the fund could pay the health care benefits of retirees for the next 80 years. He has said he is willing to make additional sacrifices to help the automakers avoid bankruptcy if auto executives, debt holders and others also sacrifice.

Lori McTavish, a Chrysler spokeswoman, and Tony Sapienza, a GM spokesman, declined to comment over the weekend on the status of the talks. Sapienza said Friday that GM was committed to meeting the Tuesday deadline. Chrysler, 80.1 percent of which is owned by Cerberus Capital Management, said it also planned to meet the deadline.

The automakers are also asking the union to end a 54-year-old benefit that ensures almost full pay during layoffs.

The so-called "supplemental unemployment benefit" gives laid-off workers most of their take-home wages. Automakers and the UAW were discussing the future of the program, said people with knowledge of the talks, who asked not to be identified because the negotiations were private. The UAW was not negotiating cuts in core wages or benefits, the people said.

If GM cannot win agreement from the UAW and creditors to reduce its debt, analysts say the administration of President Barack Obama will face a politically tough choice: either pump billions of dollars more into GM or steer it toward bankruptcy as some critics of the bailout have urged. Under Rick Wagoner, its chief executive, GM has resisted suggestions that it would be better able to restructure under a court-supervised bankruptcy. Wagoner has argued that consumers would shun GM cars and trucks if it were in bankruptcy, sending already weak sales into an irreversible tailspin.

Gettelfinger has balked at saddling retired workers with additional risk by taking devalued GM stock instead of cash. GM has received $9.4 billion from the U.S. government and has been pledged another $4 billion if it can show it can be viable at a time when U.S. auto sales are near 30-year lows.

A bankruptcy filing would allow GM to rework its contracts with creditors, the UAW, dealers and its suppliers. But it would also mean even steeper job losses. GM, Chrysler and Ford have cut 250,000 jobs since the start of the decade and are looking to cut more. GM and Chrysler are offering buyouts for most of their 91,000 UAW workers.

Chrysler has been given $4 billion in emergency financing from the U.S. Treasury and is seeking an additional $3 billion.
read more...

Saturday, January 10, 2009

The UAW Meltdown | The End Of The UAW


We are looking at the end of the UAW, they can no longer strike against the auto companies and that was their only strength.

As the UAW GM Concession talks begin, the future grows bleaker for UAW members. We now know that Ron Gettelfinger cut a deal, he agreed to never strike again to get the auto rescue loans for GM and Chrysler.

If the UAW strikes all the rescue loan must be paid back to the government. Which means any of the money that would be used for retirees and benefits (VEBA) would be at risk. The UAW is locked in for the ride.

If this was a condition set by George Bush or the Treasury, why did Ron Gettelfinger agree and didn't inform the Union members?

If the Government and auto companies are going to dictate what the wages and benefits are going to be, why does the auto worker have to pay a union?

The transplant auto companies are paying more pre hour and they have medical benefits, Why should the UAW worker make less than the southern workers and less benefits?

The Government will be in partial control of the auto companies and the UAW has no bargaining power.

Why would the new age auto worker want to be in the UAW if he or she is only making $14 an hour with no pension???

Good Luck UAW Members!
J.E.
GMCHRYSLERNEWS
read more...

Big 3 pension gap grows


Feds warn of risks in rising $41B shortfall
David Shepardson / Detroit News Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON -- The outgoing director of the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. warned Friday that Detroit's Big Three automakers face a $41 billion pension shortfall.

While the companies continue to meet government funding requirements, the situation raises concerns for the agency, which takes over pensions when companies fail, given the financial problems facing the struggling auto industry.

"We're not trying to tell people that the pension house is on fire," Charles E.F. Millard said in an interview. "The point is that in many ways this has a similar look to other situations, such as a Bethlehem Steel."

The pension corporation assumed the pensions of 95,000 people at Bethlehem Steel in 2002, when the company filed for bankruptcy, and ended up on the hook for $3.7 billion in pension costs. That plan was underfunded by $4.2 billion.

Millard said policymakers need "a clear understanding of the magnitude of the numbers and the risks" associated with the automakers.

In total, the Big Three pensions cover nearly 1.3 million people. If all three automakers were to collapse and turn their plans over to the pension corporation, the agency estimates it would pay out $13 billion of the $41 billion, because of limits set by Congress on how much the pension corporation can cover. The agency generally has a yearly cap of $54,000 in benefits for people who are 65.

A $13 billion payout would more than double the agency's $11 billion deficit.

"It is certainly possible that none of these companies ever files for bankruptcy," Millard said. "It is certainly possible that they all do." He said the risk to the agency "is significantly greater than it was six or seven months ago."

As of Nov. 30, the pension plans for hourly and salaried workers at General Motors Corp. had a combined deficit of $20 billion and Ford Motor Co. had an $11.7 billion deficit, according to Millard; Chrysler LLC had a $9.3 billion deficit as of Jan. 1. ...More
read more...

Friday, December 19, 2008

Auto Rescue: Bush to Give Low-Interest Loans to Carmakers


The White House has decided to come to the rescue of General Motors and Chrysler by providing them with $17.4 billion in low-interest loans to keep them afloat, ABC News has learned.

The money for the loans will come from the Troubled Asset Relief Program fund, signed into law this fall to bail out the financial industry. The president will provide $13.4 billion in short-term financing in December and January and plans to make another $4 billion available in February, provided it can reach into the second half of the $700 billion TARP fund to do so.

The deal also includes as a non-binding "target" a key provisions, including making work rules and wages competitive with workers at foreign car companies in the U.S.

Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli issued a statement saying the company was grateful for the helping hand and that, "Chrysler is committed to meeting these requirements."

Pressure had been building for President Bush to act. Chrysler temporarily shut down all of its plants earlier this week to save money, and GM delayed construction on a new plant for the same reason. And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urged Bush on Thursday to make a decision because the nation's weakened economy could not risk a massive wave of layoffs.

"This is a difficult time for a free-market person," Bush said Thursday. "Under ordinary circumstances, failed entities, failing entities should be allowed to fail. I have concluded these are not ordinary circumstances, for a lot of reasons... We got to the point where if a major institution were to fail, there is great likelihood that there'd be a ripple effect throughout the world, and the average person would be really hurt."

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson told a business forum in New York Thursday night it was too risky to simply let the automakers fail.

"When you look at the size of this industry and look at all those that it touches in terms of suppliers and dealers… it would seem to be an imprudent risk to take," he said....More
read more...

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Is the Auto Rescue Loans In Limbo?


WASHINGTON (AP) — Conservative Republicans admonished the White House Tuesday not to use bank-bailout billions to rescue distressed U.S. automakers, and a key Democrat demanded the government get veto power over the companies' business decisions as a condition of any aid.

The Bush administration said it was still evaluating options and suggested any deal would require major concessions by all sides. Complicating its task, lawmakers in both parties — having failed in their efforts to push a $14 billion auto rescue through a bailout-weary Congress — were pressing for an array of terms and conditions they said should be part of any Plan B.

"We are not going to be rushed into it," presidential press secretary Dana Perino declared.

Only a day earlier, President George W. Bush suggested that a rescue package would come sooner rather than later. "An abrupt bankruptcy for autos could be devastating for the economy," Bush said on Monday. "This will not be a long process because of the economic fragility of the autos."

Still, conservative Republican lawmakers, many from Southern states that are home to Japanese auto plants, wrote to Bush asking him not to use one of the most readily available pots of money — the $700 billion Wall Street rescue fund — to help the U.S. carmakers.

And the White House and Treasury Department were in talks with Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., who has been pressing for big union concessions in exchange for rescue money, on the terms and structure of a possible bailout, said a senior GOP congressional aide.

Corker came close last week to striking a deal with the United Auto Workers union for a $14 billion bill that would have forced the carmakers to bring their wages and benefits in line with those of Japanese auto companies in the U.S. by a specific date in 2009. The measure collapsed after the UAW refused to agree to wage cuts that quickly. The new contacts with the administration were disclosed on condition of anonymity because the aide was not authorized to divulge them.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass. weighed in as well, urging Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to adopt the accountability provisions included in a House-passed auto bailout bill — the product of a deal with the White House — as a condition of any bridge loans to U.S. automakers. That measure would have given a Bush-appointed overseer say-so over any major business decisions by the automakers while they were taking advantage of federal aid, including the power to nix any transaction of $100 million or more.

"Given the serious mistakes that senior auto industry executives acknowledge they have made in the past, such safeguards are absolutely necessary to ensure that taxpayers are protected and that the retooling of this critical industry proceeds as quickly as possible," Frank wrote to Paulson on Tuesday.

GM and Chrysler have said they will run out of cash within weeks if they don't get help. Ford Motor Co. has said it has enough cash to survive 2009.

Perino said the administration was still working on details of the package, which could reach $15 billion for General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC.

She said concessions had to be made in exchange for the money.

"I don't think that there's any possible way that this president would agree to allow taxpayer financing to go toward firms that are not willing to make tough decisions to become viable and competitive in the future," she said.

Bush said Tuesday that his administration was "considering all options" for helping the automakers, arguing that the already distressed economy could slide further into recession without prompt action.

"What you don't want to do is spend a lot of taxpayers' money and then have the same old stuff happen again and again and again," Bush told CNN in an interview. At the same time, he said, "we're trying to get this done in an expeditious way."

The administration indicated it would extend a helping hand to the domestic automakers after an aid effort died in Congress late last week. The White House had wanted Congress to act.

The timing and details of Plan B — the Bush administration stepping in to help the automakers directly — remain in flux. In the absence of action, lawmakers were eagerly offering up their counsel, particularly on the idea of using the $700 billion financial industry rescue fund, known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, to help U.S. automakers.

"Congress never voted for a federal bailout of the automobile industry, and the only way for TARP funds to be diverted to domestic automakers is with explicit congressional approval," wrote 26 GOP lawmakers, led by Rep. Jeb Hensarling of Texas.

Seven Senate Republicans led by Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina fired off a similar missive saying that without restructuring, "we do not believe any amount of money will succeed in saving these companies."...More
read more...

Monday, December 15, 2008

White House considers auto bailout options


WASHINGTON (AFP) — The White House said Monday it was studying options for a bailout of the US auto industry without indicating when an announcement would be made.

"We're reviewing automakers financial information, considering our policy options, and when we have something to announce, we'll announce it," said White House spokesman Tony Fratto.

He refused to "confirm or knock down or otherwise read out our contacts or deliberations, timing or substance."

The Big Three US automakers -- General Motors, Ford and Chrysler -- have warned that without a package of loans, millions of jobs could be lost, which would send ripple effects through the nation's already faltering economy.

President George W. Bush, who has hinted the government could tap a massive federal rescue package to aid the automakers, was Monday on his way back to Washington after surprise weekend visits to Iraq and Afghanistan.

His return could speed up a deal, after Bush said: "We're now in the process of working through with the stakeholders a way forward, and we're not quite ready to announce that yet.

He told reporters aboard Air Force One that "this will not be a long process because of ... the fragility of the autos."

Lawmakers have said time is running out for the auto giants, and traded blame with auto union chiefs over last week's collapse in the Senate of a short-term 14-billion dollar rescue bill.

The White House has now said it is ready to consider dipping into a 700-billion dollar Wall Street bailout agreed earlier this year to stimulate the economy and end a credit crunch.

But the Detroit Free Press newspaper reported that the size, scope and timing of any lifeline to the automakers was uncertain.

The White House was interested in two conditions, the paper said. The first was a steep reduction by creditors in automakers' debt, the second was requiring the United Auto Workers (UAW) union to take half the money due for a retiree health-care trust fund in stock, instead of in bonds or cash.

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that the US government was planning a package of between 10 and 40 billion dollars.

According to the size of the deal, the administration may have to seek congressional approval, with the new Congress not set to meet again until January 6 with a boosted Democratic majority following the November 4 elections.

Republican Senator Bob Corker, who was the Senate's pointman for a series of adjustments to the House of Representatives' bailout bill, said the UAW must make pay adjustments.

"Every car they make, they're at a competitive disadvantage because they are disadvantaged by their labor costs," Corker said Sunday.

In turn, auto representatives accused Republicans of seeking to impose unfair wage cuts.

"We need this money ... this low-interest bridge loan to get us through an emergency situation here, an economic downturn," UAW chief Ron Gettelfinger told CNN, accusing Republicans of politicizing the issue by calling for US manufacturers to bring their pay in line with foreign automakers.
read more...

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

U.S. Rescue May Give Government Stakes in GM, Ford and Chrysler


Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. government may end up holding stakes in General Motors Corp., Ford Motor Co. and Chrysler LLC if Congress and the White House reach agreement on a financial bailout for the automakers.

Under the proposed rescue, details of which are still being discussed, the Treasury would get warrants for stock equivalent to 20 percent of any government loans. With GM seeking as much as $10 billion and valued at $3 billion, the state may become the biggest shareholder. The legislation isn’t clear on what kind of holding the government would take, leaving it the option of preferred, common, voting or non-voting shares.

Democrats in Congress drafted the plan to aid automakers with $15 billion in loans. The legislation, which allows the president to appoint a so-called auto czar, needs 60 votes to overcome a Republican threat in the Senate to stall the measure in endless debate using a parliamentary maneuver called a filibuster. Some Senate Republicans yesterday expressed doubts about the plan, to be voted on in a special session this week.

“I remain concerned about committing federal dollars for the Big Three without any clear strategy that the money will be put to good use and repaid,” said Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, the top Republican on the Budget Committee....More
read more...

Friday, December 5, 2008

Bush acknowledges recession, automakers may not survive!

WASHINGTON – President George W. Bush publicly acknowledged for the first time Friday that the U.S. economy is in a recession and worried aloud that Detroit's Big Three automakers may not all survive their mounting troubles.


Four days after the long-suspected existence of a recession was made official, Bush used the word himself.

"Our economy is in a recession," Bush said flatly, speaking to reporters on the South Lawn only hours after the release of a government report showing the biggest month of job losses in 34 years. "This is in large part because of severe problems in our housing, credit and financial markets, which have resulted in significant job losses."

While repeatedly listing the serious problems in the economy, the White House has refused to embrace the actual term until Monday, when a panel for the National Bureau of Economic Research said the recession began last December and is ongoing.

With automakers, particularly General Motors, in fear of bankruptcy, they are seeking from Washington a huge cash infusion of up to $34 billion, beyond an existing $25 billion loan program. Lawmakers are considering the idea, but there is uncertainty about the level of support on Capitol Hill for that plan.

Bush displayed skepticism about the wisdom of new aid to companies that still need to make "hard choices on all aspects of their business." So while urging lawmakers to act next week to help the battered industry, Bush urged a Congress controlled by opposition Democrats to follow his approach...more
read more...

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Ford tells Congress it may be able to go it alone


WASHINGTON – Ford Motor Co. is asking Congress for a $9 billion "stand-by line of credit" to stabilize its business, but says it doesn't expect to tap it.

Unless one of Detroit's other Big Three auto companies goes bust, Ford expects to have enough money to make it through next year, it said in a plan that projected the firm will break even or turn a pretax profit in 2011.

Detroit's automakers, making a second bid for $25 billion in funding, are presenting Congress with plans Tuesday to restructure their ailing companies and provide assurances that the funding will help them survive and thrive.

General Motors Corp., Ford and Chrysler LLC said they would refinance their companies' debt, cut executive pay, seek concessions from workers and find other ways of reviving their staggering companies.

The Big Three executives also are offering a series of mostly symbolic moves to burnish their images, badly tattered after they arrived in Washington D.C. last month on three separate private jets to plead for a federal lifeline for their struggling companies.

Ford CEO Alan Mulally said he'd work for $1 per year if his firm had to take any government loan money. The company's plan also says it will cancel all management employees' 2009 bonuses, scrap merit increases for its North American salaried employees next year, and sell its five corporate aircraft.

And for this week's round of congressional hearings on the auto bailout, all three company chiefs will skip the lavish travel arrangements. Mulally is coming by car from Detroit for this week's second round of congressional hearings on government help for the Big Three. GM Chief Rick Wagoner will drive a Chevrolet Malibu hybrid sedan for the 520-mile trek from Detroit to Capitol Hill, spokesman Tony Cervone said Tuesday. And Chrysler LLC CEO Robert Nardelli won't travel by corporate jet, but a spokeswoman declined to elaborate on his travel plans, citing security reasons.

The unions were preparing to make sacrifices as well. UAW leaders summoned local union leaders from across the country to an emergency meeting Wednesday in Detroit to discuss concessions the union could make to help auto companies get government loans.

U.S. automakers are struggling to stay afloat heading into 2009 under the weight of an economic meltdown, the worst auto sales in decades and a tight credit market. General Motors, Ford and Chrysler went through nearly $18 billion in cash reserves during the last quarter, and GM and Chrysler have said they could collapse in weeks.

Top executives from the Big Three failed last month to convince a skeptical Congress that they were worthy of $25 billion in loans. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., ordered them to outline major changes, including the elimination of lavish executive pay packages and assurances that taxpayers would be reimbursed for the loans.

All three companies are filing separate plans. Congressional hearings are planned for Thursday and Friday.

"I believe the industry will make a compelling case for bridge loans that will allow the companies to return to firm financial footing," said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich.

GM will outline efforts to negotiate swapping some of the company's debt for equity stakes in the automaker, either shares or warrants for them, said two people briefed on the company's plan.

With eight separate brands, GM will also discuss efforts to shed brands but it would prefer to sell them instead of shutting down Pontiac, Saturn or Saab, said one of the people briefed on the plan. Killing off brands, like GM did with Oldsmobile in 2004, would require cash the company doesn't have, the person said. The people briefed on GM's preparations didn't want to be identified because the plan hadn't been completed.

Some members of Congress have urged the Big Three executives to take major pay cuts as part of the deal. Chrysler's Nardelli said he would work for $1 a year, and a similar commitment is expected from GM's Wagoner.

Chrysler is expected to outline changes that would include a swap of debt in the company for equity stakes and reductions in some vehicle models, according to a person who was briefed on the plan. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions were private.

Cash stockpiles at GM and Chrysler are dangerously close to the minimum amount required to run the companies, meaning they could have trouble paying all their bills by the end of the year.

GM, according to its quarterly report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, owes creditors $45 billion and it must pay more than $7.5 billion early in 2010 to a United Auto Workers trust fund that will take over retiree health care payments.

Ford owes more than $26 billion, with $6.3 billion due to its UAW trust fund at the end of 2009. Chrysler, a private company, does not have to open its books, but its CEO, Nardelli, has said it would be difficult for the company to make it without federal aid. All three likely are negotiating with the UAW for delays in payments to the trusts.

The companies are expected to seek other concessions from the United Auto Workers, including the elimination of the much-maligned jobs bank in which laid-off workers keep receiving most of their pay.

Alan Reuther, the UAW's legislative director, declined to say on Monday what kinds of concessions the union might take but said "we realize that all stakeholders need to come to the table to do what's necessary to ensure the viability of the companies. We're prepared to do our part."

The UAW leaders subsequently disclosed plans for the Wednesday meeting, where they will discuss the possibility of restructuring a multibillion-dollar union-administered health care fund so that the automakers can delay payments, according to a person familiar with the matter.

They also plan to discuss eliminating the jobs bank.

The companies are resisting calls for bankruptcy. The executives said last month that bankruptcy cannot be an option because no one would buy a car from an automaker that may not survive the life of the vehicle
read more...

Friday, November 28, 2008

The Engine Of Democracy-Auto Facts


The Engine Of Democracy Will Be Up Dec. 1st-The Engine Of Democracy
Visitors also will be able to see the impact of Detroit's automakers on their state as well as key facts and myth-busters concerning Detroit's automakers such as:


-- The automakers are requesting a bridge loan, not a bailout as Wall
Street has done. The companies need the loan because the U.S. credit
freeze has essentially closed capital markets and squeezed their cash
flow from operations that are being devastated by extremely low consumer
demand across the industry. This freeze is happening as the automakers
are in the midst of huge restructuring costs, heavy pension and health
care payments and massive-yet-crucial product and advanced technology
investments so that today's and tomorrow's vehicles are even safer and
more environmentally friendly.

-- GM, Ford and Chrysler make vehicles Americans want to buy. 50 percent of
the products sold in this country come from those companies. The
best-selling vehicle in the U.S. is a Ford; No. 2 is a GM product.

-- Motor vehicles and parts are the single largest export from the U.S.,
topping aerospace, medical equipment and communications.

-- According to J.D. Power, three of the top five brands for dependability
are American made: Buick, Cadillac and Mercury. The 2008 Chevy Malibu
is the highest ranked midsize car in initial quality. The 2008 Chevy
Silverado ranks highest in large truck quality. Ford quality is on par
with Toyota and Honda.

-- Ford has the most five-star safety rated vehicles in the industry and GM
has the same number of vehicles as Toyota that achieved the top safety
rating, according to the Institute for Highway Safety.

-- GM, Ford and Chrysler build fuel-efficient vehicles. GM has twice as
many models thatget 30 mpg or better than its nearest competitor. GM's
four new midsize crossover vehicles have best-in-class fuel economy. GM
has eight hybrids on the road today, with a total of 20 planned by 2012.
The 2-Mode Chevy Tahoe full-size SUV was named Green Car of the Year
last November. The new Ford Fusion Hybrid and Mercury Milan Hybrid beat
the Toyota Camry Hybrid by 6 miles per gallon. In minivans, Chrysler is
better than both Nissan and Toyota and basically tied with Honda.

-- GM, Ford and Chrysler have been restructuring their businesses over the
past few years that included the loss of tens of thousands of jobs, a
new labor contract with the UAW that will bring costs in line with
foreign competitors in this country, and productivity gains that have
put them on par with the competition. Ford was profitable in the first
quarter of 2008 before the economic crisis began and has been working
for two years to improve its balance sheet through aggressive
restructuring while accelerating the development of new, safe,
fuel-efficient and high quality products. GM has reduced structural
costs in North America by $9 billion since 2005, eliminated raises and
bonuses for executives and salaried employees, and aggressively
addressed its manufacturing footprint, shifting from truck and SUVs to
smaller cars and crossovers.

-- According to The Harbour Report, the manufacturing productivity bible of
the industry, GM has more plants leading their respective segments in
productivity than any other competitor, foreign or domestic.
read more...